API reference · Reading

Hide or unhide a reply

POST /v1/comments/{id}/hide

The other half of moderating a comment section. Without it the only answer to an abusive reply is to reply to it. A failure means the reply is still visible, so treat an error as "still there" rather than assuming it worked.

Request

Authenticate with a bearer API key. Agents calling over MCP authorise with OAuth instead and never handle the key.

curl -X POST https://api.postlake.dev/v1/comments/{id}/hide \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $POSTLAKE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"account":"…","hidden":true}'

Parameters

FieldTypeRequiredWhat it is
idstringYesIn the URL. The comment id

Body

FieldTypeRequiredWhat it is
accountstringYesThe connection the post is on
hiddenbooleanNofalse puts it back

Response

Success (200).

FieldTypeRequiredWhat it is
accountstringNo
platformstringNo
hiddenbooleanNo
okbooleanNo

Example

{
  "account": "…",
  "platform": "…",
  "hidden": false,
  "ok": false
}

Limits

Write operations are limited per account, and rate-limit responses include Retry-After. Do not automatically retry a write unless this operation explicitly documents idempotency.

Calling this from an agent

Agents do not call REST. They call tools. Over the hosted MCP server this operation is read_comments, and the agent authorises with OAuth so your API key is never pasted into a chat or seen by the model. The reply comes back in the same normalised shape you see above, which is what lets an agent reason about it without a per-network branch.

You control what any one agent may do with it: which brands it may act for, which networks it may reach, how much it may do in a day, and whether it may spend credits you bought up front. See the MCP server.

Errors

Every failure uses one shape: a stable type, a granular code, the field at fault in param, and a plain-language fix. An agent can act on it without a person reading the message. See Errors and retries.

Check the result before retrying a write. Only operations that explicitly support idempotency can safely replay an Idempotency-Key.

Common questions

Can an AI agent do this without the REST API?

Yes. Over MCP the same job is the read_comments tool. The agent authorises with OAuth, so no API key is pasted into a chat or seen by the model, and the answer comes back in the same normalised shape.

Is it safe to retry this call?

Do not automatically repeat a write after a timeout unless that endpoint explicitly documents idempotency. First read the resulting state; a second request could repeat the action.

What happens when it fails?

You get one error shape: a stable type, a granular code you can branch on, the offending field in param, and a fix written so an agent can correct itself rather than stop. Full list on Errors and retries.

Related